Showing posts with label home education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label home education. Show all posts

Saturday, April 02, 2011

Can home-schoolers get into university part 5- cbc viewpoint analysis



I was trying to find the link for the series I did for CBC Viewpoint Analysis with Bob Sudeyko back in 2006  
but it appears that it is no longer there! So what I've done is compiled the articles here as a resource for those who wonder 'but does home education work?'  Here is the series and if you scroll back you can read it from the beginning. Cheers!
 Grown up without school
Kate Cayley is the director of a small Toronto theatre company known as Stranger Theatre. She’s also artistic director of the Cooking Fire Festival, a festival of new outdoor works which happens in Toronto city parks. On the side she does a bit of teaching (history and creative writing) with home educated kids.
The 28 year old was unschooled right up to university and describes the then common perception of what they were doing as being “lunatic fringe.”

Growing up in busy Toronto where the population of home educated kids though very small was vibrant and lively, Cayley was able to avoid the isolation that could have been an issue, at the same time becoming pretty independent about discovering the city at a younger age; “My reference point was not the school. I could ride around on my bike-do theatre stuff because since 13, I was pretty clear that this was my path.”
She also had time to work and save money for a trip around Europe at age 16. Having a broad ranger of people to be around, that included many interesting adults was another advantage of living and learning in community, outside of an institutional context.

Granted, loneliness featured in the picture- especially at 13 and 14 when many of her home educated peers were opting for high school while she chose “to see it through.” Still, being alone, was contemplation time which she used to “develop a specific intellectual life.”

When it came time to begin the application process for university, that it was quite an “up hill walk” was no surprise. With no school records and registered as a dropout Cayley had to convince admissions that she was educated.
“I had to explain the entire concept to universities. Luckily in the time from when I began to when I graduated (1999 to 2001), it became a little bit more normal.”

Perseverence and persistence paid off. On the basis of a 20 page essay about Shelley’s ‘Adonais, she ended up on a full scholarship at University of King's College, a small liberal arts school in Halifax who were “genuinely interested.”

Cayley fell in love with university life, finding the competition and being graded “new and exciting” By the time she graduated though, she was really ready to be out of school- “I had a feeling that this had been a wonderful exp but I didn’t want to be in that context again.”

Summing up her reflections on growing up home educated, Cayley finds “the definitive difference was not being bored. Everybody I know seems to think of sessions of their adolescence as a really long period of intense boredom.”
She refers to a quote by Plato, that knowledge is only possible through the love of a particular thing that you pursue- admittedly sometimes at the sacrifice of other things; “my math is not up to scratch,” she divulges -“and I thought that home education gave me at a young age, the opportunity to learn that- that you learn something because you love it not because you are obligated to.”

------------------------------
For many home educated youth, getting into a post secondary institution, like for schooled youth is often the goal, as we have seen with Cayley’s story. Happily, with every passing year, “it becomes easier and easier,” assures Bruce Arai, acting Dean for the Brantford campus of Wilfrid Laurier. Referring to the Brantford campus, Arai says that they have admitted every single homeschooler who has applied.
In Ontario groups like the Ontario Federation for Teaching Parents (OFTP) have received a commitment from every registrar in the province to develop an admissions policy if they haven’t already done so.
Spokeswoman Katie Toksoy reports “they have various ways of looking at that -considering each home educated applicant individually, a portfolio or their work, entrance exam specially tailored to them, interview process, SAT II scores, letters of reference and essays, letters of intent to name the options.”
Home educated youth can also prepare for entrance into the university of their choice by fulfilling the admissions requirements; doing some high school courses through correspondence and distance education or reintegrating into the system at that point. Other students may enter post secondaries as mature students.
------------------------
Not all home educated students will want to take the post secondary route. Having had the experience of being self directed and learning independently all their lives, their attitude is one that can be described as ‘do it yourself.’
32 year old Andrew Gilpin of Alliston Ontario, who is a successful jazz pianist says there was no point in going to a post secondary. “I would have been able to go if I had wanted to, but the further along I went, the less purpose there seemed to be to it, because I was doing what I wanted to do, and I was able to do it, and I didn't seem to need anything, except maybe jobs, or opportunities, but you can't get that in university.”
Composing and performing with his partner Juillard trained clarinetist Jacoboski, they form the duo Ebony and Ivory. They travel around the world performing original pieces and well known pieces too.
Completely self taught, Gilpin, says he doesn’t have any pieces of paper at all, that prove that he can do any of this. “It felt strange at the beginning, until I just started performing more and more. And what you find out is that nobody in the audience ever asks for your certificates. They don't know, and they don't care.”

Adam Lim in another home educated grown up who has by passed post secondary education for the time being, working instead full time in a calling centre in Toronto. The 27 year old poet is head coach of a football team for boys ages 11 to 13 in his spare time. He is married and plans to have a family one day. If he decides to go to university Lim says he would go for psychology.

The young man who started home education at 12 found that for a Black youth as himself, home education made sense. “I wanted a broader education, and to learn more about my own culture. The constrictive school system couldn’t supply it.”
He cautions, “there is a lot of freedom in homeschooling. But you can be complacent and lazy in your work. I didn’t take advantage of it.”

To the question of alienation and socialization Lim responds, “I think you get more alienated in school then when you are homeschooled because in school you have to go along with the stereotypes, what with pop culture, peer pressure etc. Homeschooling enabled me to avoid becoming what you hear in the media.”

Wrapping it up;

Despite difficulties they might face, home educated children often get the kind of education and work they aspire to, researcher Gary Knowles of the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE) reports. “A strong sense of self and self directedness help them enter post secondaries and get jobs because they develop strengths not necessarily based on scholastics.”

The 2004 Van Pelt preliminary data on young adults confirms this claim; responsible citizenship ranked high with home educated adults; 72 percent had voted in the last 5 years, less than 7 percent had ever collected employment insurance benefits and none had ever received any social security assistance. Over 80 percent volunteered in one or more capacity.

“There’s lots of evidence that home educate children grow up to be reasonable adults, not terribly influenced by their peers, and are entrpreneurial and resourceful,” concludes Knowles.




How do they learn? The many ways of home education part 3 CBC Viewpoint Analysis


By Beatrice Ekoko Part 3: How do they learn? The many ways of home-education

Aug. 29, 2006

As the school bell summons children to their classroom desks, what are home-educated children doing? One scenario that readily comes to mind replaces desks with a kitchen table, the paid teacher with mom, both of whom are following curriculum laid out by the provincial Ministry of Education.
Liesl Neven of Dundas, Ont., has done that and much, much more, foregoing the provincial curriculum to assemble a package from an abundance of options (everything from Waldorf to Afro-centric, Charlotte Mason, feminist, classical) to suit her family's needs. Neven's guidebooks have names like Modern Curriculum Press Math, Spelling Power and Keys to Good Language.
With six children at home aged 2 to 11, Neven's home-schooling job is clearly a full time commitment. Her husband, Drew, is a self-employed carpenter.
Although they are quite flexible in how they structure each day, "we do have set things we cover," Neven explains. The children find comfortable spots to study; on couches, the kitchen table, at the public library, or outdoors, swinging in a hammock.
A typical day will have the children doing math and language arts in the morning, and science, reading and "more reading" in the afternoon. Neven believes "history is best learned through stories and biographies" and foregoes standard textbooks when exploring the lives of "Genghis Khan and the Mongol Horde," Mary Slessor, and Teresa of Calcutta, to name a few recent investigations.
"One of the most satisfying things," Neven remarks, "is to watch them become fascinated with a topic of their own and take learning to levels most school kids can't imagine."
Still, the image of omnipotent master of every subject towering in front of the blackboard might seem daunting to potential home-educators. Math, science, history, literature: Can home-educating parents have the knowledge base to make it happen for their kids?
"No individual can be expected to know everything, whether they are teachers or parents," reassures social scientist Bruce Arai, acting dean at Wilfrid Laurier University's Brantford campus.
"The essence of home education is to play a much more active role in your child's education than what happens in the school. It's not about conveying knowledge from the mind of one person into the mind of another, filling up this empty vessel that is your child. It's really giving them the opportunity and the resources to learn on their own."
What parents need is to "be open-minded and willing to work with the children," Arai concludes.
Central to many home-educating philosophies is the freedom to allow children to, as Neven puts it, "becoming fascinated with a topic of their own."
For a sizeable number of home-educators, curricula of any kind are cast aside as unnecessary, unhelpful constraints on what they consider an entirely natural process. Humans are, as has been pointed out, learning animals.
Whereas school structure is seen to limit natural curiosity by adhering to schedules and pre-determined units or themes, home-education permits children to become self-directed learners. The belief that humans learn best when free to follow their interests gets the label "natural learning." It is an ideal summed up in the epigram by George Bernard Shaw that has "the child in pursuit of knowledge, not knowledge in pursuit of the child."
To some it is called "life learning," "independent learning," or as the late John Holt coined it "unschooling."
A former teacher, Holt's experience around children led him to agree with 20th century historian, thinker and iconoclast, Ivan Illich, that "most learning is not the result of instruction. It is rather the result of unhampered participation in a meaningful setting."
Unschooling parents act more like facilitators and guides than teachers, focusing their energy on "exposing rather than imposing," as one home-educator puts it.
Bev Hoefs embraced unschooling philosophy while raising her four children. The flexibility that unschooling provides enables her to run her Carlisle, Ont.,-based home business, making "baby slings," and also allows her children access to more of "the real world"' learning business skills, meeting people in the community, and earning money for passionate pursuits and interests, like horseback riding.
"They resented it a bit when I was on the phone with a customer, and we were late getting to their activities," Hoefs recalls. "But they enjoyed going into Toronto with me to go fabric shopping and factoring in other excursions."
Hoefs's oldest daughter entered grade 11 last February but still makes time to hone her entrepreneurial skills making and selling baby keepsakes bracelets.
Hoefs, who has only one daughter left home to educate, says that unschooling has given her children the opportunity to "do their own thing, whatever they want to do," although she admits unschooling is "definitely a leap of faith."
When her eldest, at Lake Head University taking Outdoor Recreation, decided to attend school for grade 11, Hoefs confesses she had doubts about his preparedness.
But by graduation he was on the principal's honour roll. "They get in there and they figure it out. It really doesn't have anything to do with what we make them learn!!"
Whatever the home-education model they pick, be it a learning community, a teaching cooperative between parents, distance education programs, and, in the case of older children and youth, engaging in an apprenticeship, mentoring arrangement or attending college courses, families can find support and companionship along the journey. They may find other families to exchange resources with, join drop-ins, or join online support groups when they need help. No family need go it alone.



YOUR LETTERS

While I appreciate the sentiment attached to this article, I can't help but wonder at the gaps left in a child's socialization when he/she is removed from the public system.

It seems to me that this style of education is informed by individualist child-centered educational theory, and spends little time developing a viable interpersonal community within which children can grow into their personhood. If it takes a whole village to raise a child I wonder at parents who have choose to assume that role alone.

While I appreciate the comment from the reader who has chosen to educate her child at home (and socializes them through after-school activities), this approach seems to be particular to her family structure and may not be viable for many families - especially lower-income families with two full-time employed parents.

In my view, instead of giving up on the public school system, we need to develop new approaches to community-based education that retain a richly social model of education, while strongly increasing the role that parents play in the education of their child.

Home schooling seems to be a short-term solution to a public school system plagued with long-term problems.

Chris Lepine | Edmonton, AB


Home schooling is appropriate for some kids/families, just as public school is appropriate for some, Montessori is appropriate for some, etc.

Different children have different learning styles, which are not always satisfied in public school, or Montessori, or home schooling, etc. The trick is to find the situation which works for each child and each family.

After having worked in public education as both a teacher's aide and as a teacher, from kindergarten through to college, I have observed that giving the children the tools to learn with, instilling in them the enthusiasm to learn, and allowing them to follow their passion as a framework for learning are pretty much the key to a successful education, including having the child take some responsibility for his/her own education.

I've watched three local families raise their children (ranging in age from 17 to two) using a combination of home school learning. These kids are remarkable, responsible, personable and bright, and the overwhelming majority of them plan to attend post-secondary institutions ranging from universities to music schools, to formalized apprenticeship opportunities, all with a combination of study and work times.

We need to recognize that not all children learn the same way, as well as to embrace differing approaches to family culture.

Leah Main | Silverton, BC


This series is so encouraging for a new unschooling parent!

As a co-parent of two children adopted at ages six and nine from the child welfare system just two years ago, a home based education has been the answer to cope with substantial learning gaps. However, as we experienced the closure of those gaps we realized the countless other benefits of unschooling.

We have the awesome privilege of watching our children transform before our eyes! They have become sponges for the 3Rs and our daughter has exclaimed on a number of occasions, "Math is fun now - it makes sense!" Their developing self worth is evident with the tenacity they demonstrate when tackling new problems and any of the social/emotional challenges they came to our home with have all but disappeared.

As a social worker in the field of child psychiatry I have come to appreciate how a home based education enhances the parent-child bond, which is the social template for all other future relationships. My children and I learn together, play together and live together - then at the end of the public school day they learn and play with the neighbourhood children, attend swimming lessons, social clubs and church. It is a great pleasure to be such an agent for the education and socialization of my children!

Simone Pelley | Conception Bay South, NL




I find it hard to believe a child can learn math outdoors in a hammock, and noting same does nothing to reduce the stigma associated with home-schooled children.

While stories can be enlightening, policy has to be based on hard information. Does anyone have any sort of idea as to what proportion of home-schooled individuals go on to post-secondary education, as opposed to individuals who go through the standard school system?

What types of careers are these people getting? How about average income? What about the development of social skills and exposure to different perspectives and cultures?

My home schooling took place from supper time to bed time, and included weekends.

Jonathan Dale | St. John's, NL




These articles are very unbalanced. A few feel-good testimonials, some quotes from experts, who most likely were not unschooled.

The ancient Greek teachers used their version of the classroom for teaching. Now this is not a good system any longer.

If unschooling is, it would be wise for governments to get out of the education business, at least in the early stages.

I agree we humans are designed to be learning animals, like all other mammals. I work in social services. I meet a lot people who, for whatever reason, have little desire to learn. Children want to learn but some of them eventual lose the passion along the way. You can blame it on a number of things. Passion is lost for some.

Nick Pirozzoli | Brantford, ON

By Beatrice Ekoko Part 2: Who Home Educates?

August 16, 2006

While home-based education may seem like a risky or experimental new venture into unfamiliar territory — and many of those who embrace it will frankly admit it sometimes feels that way — it is not new.
Throughout history people have always taught their own children or had other kinds of learning arrangements in place, be it mentoring, apprenticeship, tutors or incidental.
Compulsory schooling, on the other hand, is not much older than 150 years old in North America. In Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador, a child's education was the responsibility of the family, not the state, until 1943. Seen in this perspective, mass institutionalized education — not home-education — might look more like the experiment.
Ministries of education have achieved a breathtaking degree of control in those succeeding generations, creating the widely held impression that school is the place to go if you want to learn. Home-education re-entered public awareness in large part due to the "hippie movement based on the counter-cultural influences of the 1960s," writes Dr. Bruce Arai in Canadian Journal of Education, 2000. The pre-eminence of formal, curriculum-based, mass schooling had always had its critics, but the hippies went further and put the alternatives into practice.
Linda Quirke, an assistant professor at Wilfrid Laurier University, notes the changing landscape: Twenty-five years ago, to home-educate your child was something "unique, quite distinct and different. Many people hadn't even heard of it, so in that era, it really was something unconventional. Now it's become something easier to try," she says. "The stigma of being a home-schooling family is much less today than before when parents would have had to overcome hurdles, especially legal hurdles in the U.S., in order to do it."
While many provinces closely regulate home-based education by means of curriculum requirements and inspections, few provinces require families to register with a school board. As a result, many tend to remain below the radar; tracking home-educators becomes a tricky business.
The most recent attempt to uncover the home-education demographic is a 2004 survey conducted by Deani Van Pelt for the Canadian Centre for Home Education (CCEE) in Alberta. The data gleaned from the survey of more than 1600 home-educating families suggests it is no longer recognizable as a "hippie movement."
According to the findings, a typical Canadian home-educating household is a white, Christian, two-parent family with a father as primary income earner. These families tend to have a slightly lower than average income because the mother usually stays home with an average 3.6 children (well above the national average of 1.1) of elementary school age. However, "mothers do contribute to the family income at a higher rate than in the past," Van Pelt notes.
And while most home-educating parents tend to have more college or university education than the average, few are certified teachers. Less than two per cent were home-educated themselves.
Geographically, the provinces of Alberta and Ontario have the greatest number of home- educating families. The majority reside in the suburbs and rural areas where it might be easier to cut costs and live more simply — often in keeping with other values they may hold concerning lifestyle, such as a preference for holistic living over consumerism.
According to Arai's research, some parents felt strongly that home-schooling is part of an alternative lifestyle, but "the majority of parents … felt that they were normal in all respects, except for the fact that their children did not go to school."
Demographics can reveal much about the question, but can obscure much as well.
"The question, of course, is whether this sample group is representative … of all home- educators in the country," Van Pelt says. "Just because the majority of participants reflect a certain demographic does not negate the presence of a wide and growing diversity of others."
"People right across the spectrum home-educate," says Gary Knowles, a professor with the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. "A cross-section reveals people with huge resources and wealth, to those with meager means. Even homeless people 'home'-educate," Knowles says.
In his experience, Knowles says he has found that home-educators, whether single parents or same sex, aboriginal or white, are similar in that they are "generally resourceful and independent people who are confident enough to take charge."
To many people of marginalized heritage, home-based education can represent an empowering break from a model that has traditionally not served them well. In some cases, such as the residential schools forced upon aboriginal communities, formalized education has been a destructive force wreaking havoc on traditional culture.
Many black home-educating parents who have grown up in the school system report having to endure subtle or openly negative assumptions about their intellectual abilities; as a result, issues of low self-esteem haunt their experience.
For such parents, home-education can become "an avenue to give black children a new way of seeing themselves," says Monica Wells Kisura, a political economist researching Black/African Canadians and Americans home-schoolers, while completing her Ph.D. in international relations at American University in Washington, D.C.
Yet choosing to home-educate remains a difficult choice for people who have, nevertheless, come to view conventional schooling as a means to social mobility.
"Home-schooling is the most radical statement that black people have made regarding self determination and resistance since decolonization and the Civil Rights movement in the '60s" Kisura says.
Home-education can be viewed as a movement of many movements, a realm increasingly inhabited by people of varied religions, philosophies and ethnic backgrounds. What unites them is simply the fact that they don't regularly attend school. Howthey learn becomes more personalized, at times idiosyncratic, with widely divergent methods employed, as we shall see in subsequent articles.
YOUR LETTERS: I didn't think that home education was still an issue for debate; I would think only an issue for discussion. In my view, it's part of our culture and society and it will never go away. I home educated my three children successfully for eight years. Two are in university on substantial scholarships, in the U.S. and Canada. Our youngest is a straight A student in public school with what her teacher referred to as "extraordinary leadership abilities, well beyond her years." I look forward to following her development over the course of the next few years. I have taken opportunity to ask my eldest, who is now 20, "Do you feel you missed out on not being in public school through high school especially?" He never hesitates to state, "No, It was the best thing you ever did for me. I will always be grateful for what you did." He recently won a major competition at his undergrad school in California, competing against Masters level students. I believe he has an advantage over his peers because he was home educated and had productive time to focus on his career development. I have returned to my career and have since taken on university to complete my degree, a life long dream. Had I not chosen to home educate my children, I don't believe they or I would be where we are today. Tricia | British Columbia Your story on home-education was very much appreciated. Although this type of education is gaining more and more popularity, it is not often that I find references to it in the media, so it was interesting to read it. I want to share my own experiences, since I was home schooled for most of my elementary and secondary education. What I've noticed over the course of my life is an ongoing growth in maturity for the home education movement. When my parents decided to home school me (before I would have started kindergarten), this was something relatively unknown. My mother had a friend with a doctorate in education that recommended that she try it. I have always appreciated the recommendation! Home education gave me an education that, while not perfect, was custom designed to my specific strengths and weaknesses. I developed a love of learning, as well as an ability to work independently that has served me well throughout my university years. Now in my early twenties, I would very much like to home school my own children. This does not mean that I have anything against schools in general. Actually, I attended high school for one semester in Grade 9, and then again in Grade 11. I was a part-time student for the first semester, and attended full time during the second semester. Both times I elected to return home the following year, not because I hadn't enjoyed my time in school, but simply because I felt that (on the whole) I preferred to be home schooled. One reason why it was possible for me to make that choice was because of the presence in my city of a fabulous support group for homes schooled teenagers. It provided social activities, as well as academic support in certain subjects. More and more, parents who home school do not do so out of a desire for an "alternative lifestyle"; many of them see home schooling as very mainstream and normal. Many home schooling families I know have opted for a "combination" approach, where their children attend school for a few years (in some cases "just to try it") or receive high school credits through online courses. Many home schooling families have mothers who work outside the home. My mother home schooled my two younger brothers while operating a family-owned bookstore. Most home schooling fathers are heavily involved in their children's education; often parents divide up the subjects they are most comfortable teaching. Home schooling does not suit every child or parent best. But for many, I feel that this sort of "mixed" approach will prove suitable. A child can benefit from a variety of education approaches, including a traditional classroom setting, online learning, and a good dose of parental love and encouragement. Education is not a one-size-fits-all approach, even with an individual child! On the whole, while growing up I usually thought of myself as being perfectly natural, spending most of my time with my family instead of in an institutional setting. I appreciate the many fine teachers I know who teach in public schools, and have even considered becoming one myself. But, for parents who are in a position to integrate home education - whether on a full or part time basis - into their children's life, I highly recommend it. Michael Trolly | Ottawa, ON Kudos to Ms. Ekoko for presenting her clearly elucidated position on home educating. Two of my nephews (aged eight and 10) are home educated and there is no question that the benefits of this have been remarkable for them. Of course their parents have had to make some significant sacrifices in terms of lifestyle to make it possible. As an example, living here in Vancouver with inflated housing costs has not been possible for them. There seem to be some inevitable sacrifices here and there in the curriculum as well - not only on a daily basis but also as some facets of the program get more and less attention than others. Some days get more educational focus than others, etc. Significant support for curriculum is available, however, and if home educating families join with others these difficulties can easily be turned into new learning opportunities. Joint classes or group field trips, a morning with the Joneses to learn about the fish in their pond, etc. become feasible - and may make exploiting those teachable moments much more meaningful and present for the children. Correspondence and electronically delivered curriculum materials are also available and make the job of teaching and learning with their children much easier for parents than one might imagine. Several home-educating families that I've met started to feel uneasy around the beginning of what would be high school for their children's' peers. They began to face some difficult questions. How will we deal with increasingly demanding content in mathematics for instance, how will we conduct lab experiments in science classes? I was a university instructor for many years and now teach senior science and mathematics at a small private high school. My wife is a humanities teacher at the same school and we both have graduate-level training in our areas. I'm quite confident that between us we could do justice to the secondary curriculum, and if we were to decide to home educate our children when they reach school age we certainly wouldn't try to do it alone. We would do as much as we could to become part of a community of home educating families. The learning and social learning opportunities this would produce would be invaluable. So what would such a network of interdependent home educating families and their schooling experience look like? Parents (let's call them teachers for a moment) could play their strengths to the benefit of all the students, and the students could learn and grow with others in a community of strong and common values. Clearly large public schools are increasingly impersonal and very difficult for some students. And some parents feel their family's values aren't reflected in those environments. For those families home schooling can be a valuable option. I would add that a small, quality school with a parent, student and teaching community that shares a family's values can be another valuable option. Of course both entail sacrifice, but that is no surprise to a family with a strong enough conviction to consider home education or private schooling in the first place. Aaron | Vancouver, BC Thanks for referring to home-education, not schooling. Much of the effort emphasizes positive education, not the "colonial" socializing of children, hence the waves of unschooling, deschooling movements. In the 70's we liked to quote Dr. Raymond Moore who promoted late start to school (if at all) to 10 years: "The sooner you institutionalize your children, the sooner they will institutionalize you." In 1970 while attending lectures with Ivan Illich (of deschooling society fame) in Mexico, I met with John Holt and acquainted him with the legalities of home education. He was soon to start his newsletter "Growing Without Schooling". Looking forward to more articles. Tunya Audain | West Vancouver, BC As a home educator for the past 12 years, I really enjoyed reading this and gaining even more insight into the movement across the country. I'm looking forward ot reading the next article. Andrea | Miramichi N.B. I home schooled my daughter because her learning disability was not being accommodated in the regular school system and she was being bullied by other students and teachers. She grew into an independent, motivated, curious young lady with a strong appreciation for life-long learning. D. Bonnycastle|Saskatoon, SK I was not surprised by the factoid that the hippies started or restarted the practice. But I was surprised to learn that some of our eastern provinces put the onus of education on the parent and didn't have any state run education until 1943. The questions that we need to ask and answer are these: What do we mean by education? And if state education is the experiment, why did we change from centuries of home schooling to state run education systems? Societies grow and change. Expectations change. Many parents demand that the state provide subsidized daycare for their children. Daycare is another form of state institutionalization. Frankly if the state wanted to save billions, it would be get out of the school business. What we are discussing in this debate is whether I like my children to stay home under my control, or for part of the day let someone else be in control. Nick Pirozzoli | Brantford, ON

Who Home Educates? part 2 of a CBC viewpoint analysis series on home education

By Beatrice Ekoko Part 2: Who Home Educates?

August 16, 2006

While home-based education may seem like a risky or experimental new venture into unfamiliar territory — and many of those who embrace it will frankly admit it sometimes feels that way — it is not new.
Throughout history people have always taught their own children or had other kinds of learning arrangements in place, be it mentoring, apprenticeship, tutors or incidental.
Compulsory schooling, on the other hand, is not much older than 150 years old in North America. In Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador, a child's education was the responsibility of the family, not the state, until 1943. Seen in this perspective, mass institutionalized education — not home-education — might look more like the experiment.
Ministries of education have achieved a breathtaking degree of control in those succeeding generations, creating the widely held impression that school is the place to go if you want to learn. Home-education re-entered public awareness in large part due to the "hippie movement based on the counter-cultural influences of the 1960s," writes Dr. Bruce Arai in Canadian Journal of Education, 2000. The pre-eminence of formal, curriculum-based, mass schooling had always had its critics, but the hippies went further and put the alternatives into practice.
Linda Quirke, an assistant professor at Wilfrid Laurier University, notes the changing landscape: Twenty-five years ago, to home-educate your child was something "unique, quite distinct and different. Many people hadn't even heard of it, so in that era, it really was something unconventional. Now it's become something easier to try," she says. "The stigma of being a home-schooling family is much less today than before when parents would have had to overcome hurdles, especially legal hurdles in the U.S., in order to do it."
While many provinces closely regulate home-based education by means of curriculum requirements and inspections, few provinces require families to register with a school board. As a result, many tend to remain below the radar; tracking home-educators becomes a tricky business.
The most recent attempt to uncover the home-education demographic is a 2004 survey conducted by Deani Van Pelt for the Canadian Centre for Home Education (CCEE) in Alberta. The data gleaned from the survey of more than 1600 home-educating families suggests it is no longer recognizable as a "hippie movement."
According to the findings, a typical Canadian home-educating household is a white, Christian, two-parent family with a father as primary income earner. These families tend to have a slightly lower than average income because the mother usually stays home with an average 3.6 children (well above the national average of 1.1) of elementary school age. However, "mothers do contribute to the family income at a higher rate than in the past," Van Pelt notes.
And while most home-educating parents tend to have more college or university education than the average, few are certified teachers. Less than two per cent were home-educated themselves.
Geographically, the provinces of Alberta and Ontario have the greatest number of home- educating families. The majority reside in the suburbs and rural areas where it might be easier to cut costs and live more simply — often in keeping with other values they may hold concerning lifestyle, such as a preference for holistic living over consumerism.
According to Arai's research, some parents felt strongly that home-schooling is part of an alternative lifestyle, but "the majority of parents … felt that they were normal in all respects, except for the fact that their children did not go to school."
Demographics can reveal much about the question, but can obscure much as well.
"The question, of course, is whether this sample group is representative … of all home- educators in the country," Van Pelt says. "Just because the majority of participants reflect a certain demographic does not negate the presence of a wide and growing diversity of others."
"People right across the spectrum home-educate," says Gary Knowles, a professor with the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. "A cross-section reveals people with huge resources and wealth, to those with meager means. Even homeless people 'home'-educate," Knowles says.
In his experience, Knowles says he has found that home-educators, whether single parents or same sex, aboriginal or white, are similar in that they are "generally resourceful and independent people who are confident enough to take charge."
To many people of marginalized heritage, home-based education can represent an empowering break from a model that has traditionally not served them well. In some cases, such as the residential schools forced upon aboriginal communities, formalized education has been a destructive force wreaking havoc on traditional culture.
Many black home-educating parents who have grown up in the school system report having to endure subtle or openly negative assumptions about their intellectual abilities; as a result, issues of low self-esteem haunt their experience.
For such parents, home-education can become "an avenue to give black children a new way of seeing themselves," says Monica Wells Kisura, a political economist researching Black/African Canadians and Americans home-schoolers, while completing her Ph.D. in international relations at American University in Washington, D.C.
Yet choosing to home-educate remains a difficult choice for people who have, nevertheless, come to view conventional schooling as a means to social mobility.
"Home-schooling is the most radical statement that black people have made regarding self determination and resistance since decolonization and the Civil Rights movement in the '60s" Kisura says.
Home-education can be viewed as a movement of many movements, a realm increasingly inhabited by people of varied religions, philosophies and ethnic backgrounds. What unites them is simply the fact that they don't regularly attend school. Howthey learn becomes more personalized, at times idiosyncratic, with widely divergent methods employed, as we shall see in subsequent articles.
YOUR LETTERS: I didn't think that home education was still an issue for debate; I would think only an issue for discussion. In my view, it's part of our culture and society and it will never go away. I home educated my three children successfully for eight years. Two are in university on substantial scholarships, in the U.S. and Canada. Our youngest is a straight A student in public school with what her teacher referred to as "extraordinary leadership abilities, well beyond her years." I look forward to following her development over the course of the next few years. I have taken opportunity to ask my eldest, who is now 20, "Do you feel you missed out on not being in public school through high school especially?" He never hesitates to state, "No, It was the best thing you ever did for me. I will always be grateful for what you did." He recently won a major competition at his undergrad school in California, competing against Masters level students. I believe he has an advantage over his peers because he was home educated and had productive time to focus on his career development. I have returned to my career and have since taken on university to complete my degree, a life long dream. Had I not chosen to home educate my children, I don't believe they or I would be where we are today. Tricia | British Columbia Your story on home-education was very much appreciated. Although this type of education is gaining more and more popularity, it is not often that I find references to it in the media, so it was interesting to read it. I want to share my own experiences, since I was home schooled for most of my elementary and secondary education. What I've noticed over the course of my life is an ongoing growth in maturity for the home education movement. When my parents decided to home school me (before I would have started kindergarten), this was something relatively unknown. My mother had a friend with a doctorate in education that recommended that she try it. I have always appreciated the recommendation! Home education gave me an education that, while not perfect, was custom designed to my specific strengths and weaknesses. I developed a love of learning, as well as an ability to work independently that has served me well throughout my university years. Now in my early twenties, I would very much like to home school my own children. This does not mean that I have anything against schools in general. Actually, I attended high school for one semester in Grade 9, and then again in Grade 11. I was a part-time student for the first semester, and attended full time during the second semester. Both times I elected to return home the following year, not because I hadn't enjoyed my time in school, but simply because I felt that (on the whole) I preferred to be home schooled. One reason why it was possible for me to make that choice was because of the presence in my city of a fabulous support group for homes schooled teenagers. It provided social activities, as well as academic support in certain subjects. More and more, parents who home school do not do so out of a desire for an "alternative lifestyle"; many of them see home schooling as very mainstream and normal. Many home schooling families I know have opted for a "combination" approach, where their children attend school for a few years (in some cases "just to try it") or receive high school credits through online courses. Many home schooling families have mothers who work outside the home. My mother home schooled my two younger brothers while operating a family-owned bookstore. Most home schooling fathers are heavily involved in their children's education; often parents divide up the subjects they are most comfortable teaching. Home schooling does not suit every child or parent best. But for many, I feel that this sort of "mixed" approach will prove suitable. A child can benefit from a variety of education approaches, including a traditional classroom setting, online learning, and a good dose of parental love and encouragement. Education is not a one-size-fits-all approach, even with an individual child! On the whole, while growing up I usually thought of myself as being perfectly natural, spending most of my time with my family instead of in an institutional setting. I appreciate the many fine teachers I know who teach in public schools, and have even considered becoming one myself. But, for parents who are in a position to integrate home education - whether on a full or part time basis - into their children's life, I highly recommend it. Michael Trolly | Ottawa, ON Kudos to Ms. Ekoko for presenting her clearly elucidated position on home educating. Two of my nephews (aged eight and 10) are home educated and there is no question that the benefits of this have been remarkable for them. Of course their parents have had to make some significant sacrifices in terms of lifestyle to make it possible. As an example, living here in Vancouver with inflated housing costs has not been possible for them. There seem to be some inevitable sacrifices here and there in the curriculum as well - not only on a daily basis but also as some facets of the program get more and less attention than others. Some days get more educational focus than others, etc. Significant support for curriculum is available, however, and if home educating families join with others these difficulties can easily be turned into new learning opportunities. Joint classes or group field trips, a morning with the Joneses to learn about the fish in their pond, etc. become feasible - and may make exploiting those teachable moments much more meaningful and present for the children. Correspondence and electronically delivered curriculum materials are also available and make the job of teaching and learning with their children much easier for parents than one might imagine. Several home-educating families that I've met started to feel uneasy around the beginning of what would be high school for their children's' peers. They began to face some difficult questions. How will we deal with increasingly demanding content in mathematics for instance, how will we conduct lab experiments in science classes? I was a university instructor for many years and now teach senior science and mathematics at a small private high school. My wife is a humanities teacher at the same school and we both have graduate-level training in our areas. I'm quite confident that between us we could do justice to the secondary curriculum, and if we were to decide to home educate our children when they reach school age we certainly wouldn't try to do it alone. We would do as much as we could to become part of a community of home educating families. The learning and social learning opportunities this would produce would be invaluable. So what would such a network of interdependent home educating families and their schooling experience look like? Parents (let's call them teachers for a moment) could play their strengths to the benefit of all the students, and the students could learn and grow with others in a community of strong and common values. Clearly large public schools are increasingly impersonal and very difficult for some students. And some parents feel their family's values aren't reflected in those environments. For those families home schooling can be a valuable option. I would add that a small, quality school with a parent, student and teaching community that shares a family's values can be another valuable option. Of course both entail sacrifice, but that is no surprise to a family with a strong enough conviction to consider home education or private schooling in the first place. Aaron | Vancouver, BC Thanks for referring to home-education, not schooling. Much of the effort emphasizes positive education, not the "colonial" socializing of children, hence the waves of unschooling, deschooling movements. In the 70's we liked to quote Dr. Raymond Moore who promoted late start to school (if at all) to 10 years: "The sooner you institutionalize your children, the sooner they will institutionalize you." In 1970 while attending lectures with Ivan Illich (of deschooling society fame) in Mexico, I met with John Holt and acquainted him with the legalities of home education. He was soon to start his newsletter "Growing Without Schooling". Looking forward to more articles. Tunya Audain | West Vancouver, BC As a home educator for the past 12 years, I really enjoyed reading this and gaining even more insight into the movement across the country. I'm looking forward ot reading the next article. Andrea | Miramichi N.B. I home schooled my daughter because her learning disability was not being accommodated in the regular school system and she was being bullied by other students and teachers. She grew into an independent, motivated, curious young lady with a strong appreciation for life-long learning. D. Bonnycastle|Saskatoon, SK I was not surprised by the factoid that the hippies started or restarted the practice. But I was surprised to learn that some of our eastern provinces put the onus of education on the parent and didn't have any state run education until 1943. The questions that we need to ask and answer are these: What do we mean by education? And if state education is the experiment, why did we change from centuries of home schooling to state run education systems? Societies grow and change. Expectations change. Many parents demand that the state provide subsidized daycare for their children. Daycare is another form of state institutionalization. Frankly if the state wanted to save billions, it would be get out of the school business. What we are discussing in this debate is whether I like my children to stay home under my control, or for part of the day let someone else be in control. Nick Pirozzoli | Brantford, ON

Minding Your Own: Part 1 CBC Viewpoint Analysis Series on Home Education

Seriously CBC? I was trying to find the link for the series I did for CBC Viewpoint Analysis with Bob Sudeyko back in 2006  

http://www.cbc.ca/news/viewpoint/vp_ekoko/20061221.html

but it appears that it is no longer there! So what I've done is compiled the articles here as a resource for those who wonder 'but does home education work?' Cheers!

 By Beatrice Ekoko part 1: Minding Your Own

July 13, 2006

Stefanie Mohsennia is a librarian, a self-described "sit down, read and write type." She liked school and did very well. But as a parent, she began to see that her son's learning style differed from hers; she became concerned the school would be unable to answer his needs.
Basics, like the structure of the school day, interfered. Mohsennia said her seven-year-old son "would not be interested in math at 8 or 9 a.m. in the morning."
"Why sacrifice his love of learning?" she asks.
She took a big step and decided to home-school her son. But ironically, to home-school, she had to leave her home.
Mohsennia relocated to Canada from her native Germany, where home education is legally verboten.
Home-schooling is legal everywhere in Canada. Mohsennia's son joins the 80,000 kids estimated by the Canadian Centre for Home Education who are being home-educated as the movement to teach your own grows steadily.
An increasing awareness, understanding and respect for different kinds of learning styles and multiple types of intelligences are stirring the public conscience.
An intensive parenting trend is driving this "profound culture shift," says Professor Scott Davies, a sociologist at McMaster University in Hamilton.
According to Davies, an "underlying culture" among middle-class parents that "prioritizes the needs of the individual child" leads to a "highly individualized conception of learning, one that prizes a customized experience to enhance a child's personality, idiosyncratic talents, cognitive style and sense of self."
'Language of choice and rights'
Davies' research reveals an underlying discourse centring around the "language of choice and rights" that has more and more parents shopping around for styles in a free market of pedagogy.
Questioning parents give voice to a critique of public education that's as old as, well, public education.
When compulsory national education was proposed in 18th-century England, political critic William Godwin penned one of the first objections to national education.
In his Enquiry Concerning Political Justice (1793), Godwin warned that "a national education has the most direct tendency to perpetuate ... errors, and to form all minds upon one model."
The one model is firmly entrenched as a major industry with a labyrinth of bureaucracy built around it. In Ontario, the education budget teeters at $17.5 billion a year, with measures proposed at the Ministry of Education that would motivate students to stay in school and keep learning until the age of 18 by threatening fines or revoking driver's licences for drop-outs.
Home-educators who believe that learning is a natural human attribute have a view which is conflicting to the ministry's: motivation must come from within, and, so the theory goes, when people are given charge of their choices with practical support they will come to perceive themselves as life-long learners.
Step outside the one model and the bulk of research indicates that the majority of parents who home-educate do so because they are concerned their children don't get enough moral/religious instruction at school. A smaller but still sizable number eschew the formal structure of school with its standardized curriculum, slotted class times, hierarchy and age segregation and instead seek to provide conditions for more informal, incidental, child-centred learning to occur.
Professor Gary Knowles of the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education has studied home-educating families for close to 25 years. He notes that "across the spectrum of home-educators, the desire to preserve the integrity of the family and the connection to community is one of the strongest reasons for why parents decide to keep their kids home."
Gloomy reports fade into background
Keeping the kids home means teacher strikes, violence in schools, bullying, peer pressure, boredom, restlessness and other gloomy reports from the front lines of classrooms recede to become background noise.
But leaving school — for motivated families — means an active role pursuing their interests by exploring and engaging resources in their communities. Learning becomes a family project that shifts from formal pedagogy to becoming more of a lifestyle.
For parents from minority groups, home-educating provides an opportunity to teach their own heritage.
Home-schooling families find some of their staunchest supporters in former teachers like American author John Taylor Gatto. Gatto, who penned the iconoclastic Dumbing Us Down, recalls how he "slowly … began to realize that the bells and the confinement, the crazy sequences, the age-segregation, the lack of privacy, the constant surveillance, and all the rest of national curriculum of schooling were designed exactly as if someone had set out to prevent children from learning how to think and act, to coax them into addiction and dependent behavior."
Distinguishing between education and schooling, Life Learning Magazine publisher Wendy Priesnitz writes that schooling "confuses teaching with learning, grade advancement with education, a diploma with competence, and fluency with the ability to say something new."
Are schools up to the task of preparing children for a future requiring the ability to be flexible, resourceful and self-directed to keep up with the changing demands of society? While the question remains open to debate, home-educating families aren't waiting to find out.

LETTERS:

I found the article on homeschooling interesting, but I have to admit, I found the feedback comments even more so. My oldest daughter has been taught at home for 4 years. She has never attended a publicly funded school nor sat in a traditional classroom environment. According to some, this lack of pubilc schooling would mean that she has a lack of social skills as well. One would expect then that when among her peers, she would be unable to navigate the social structure. She could even appear odd, out of place and unable to negotiate, problem solve or even work with others in a team effort. If not being in school causes children to be socially behind their public schooled peers, then it should be quite easy to spot the homeschooled children on the playground. Hmm...well that's funny because so far when others find out my daughter is taught at home they are genuinely surprised. She appears to be just like all the other kids in the group, except that her acedemic abilities often far surpass her age group. She's often the organizer, the planner, the one in charge of the group activity on the playground. She's the one who searches out other children so as to include everyone in the game regardless of their age or ability. She's the one who works to make the chosen activity fair and fun for all involved. I suppose that type of social behaviour could make her unlike her peers. But so far, that has not been a behaviour that others have viewed as negative. If my daughter is truly lacking the social skills of her public schooled peers, then all I can think is perhaps less is more. Email: kimweh@yahoo.com SUBJECT2: CBC News: Analysis & Viewpoint: Minding your own - Home based education Subject: Comment: CBC News: Analysis & Viewpoint: Minding your own - Home based education CityandCountry: Owen Sound,Ontario Name: Kim Wehrle "What about the social skills that home-schooled children will never experience due to seclusion? Important life lessons are learned on the playground every day, and though some children certainly require more attention than others in the classroom, those who home-school ALL of their children are, in the lamest terms, keeping them away from the real world."

As a homeschooling parent, I just have to say that this is SO TRUE.

With all the free time my son has from not being stuck in a classroom all day long, he's totally not able to participate in karate classes, gymnastics classes, violin lessons and orchestra rehearsals, ballet classes, and art classes. And he certainly never interacts with other kids while at those classes.

He also never plays with the kids in the neighbourhood (when they're home from school). Neither does he play with friends from our homeschooling groups. He never has conflicts with other neighbour kids that he has to resolve. He's kept locked up and never sees anyone except for me.

Because of course we all know that public-school kids get all of their 'socializing' while in classes sitting quietly behind their desks, and not when they're home playing outside with their friends, or visiting relatives, or having slumber parties.

And when my son is helping me with the grocery shopping, when he's observing me doing the banking, when we're watching or reading the news, when we're talking about business and industry in Canada and internationally and how finances work and how to fill out forms and applications with the government, when he's helping with the housework and learning how to look after younger children, when he's out and about with me as I do my errands around the community, etc etc, he's absolutely being totally cut off from the 'real world'.

Unlike his fellows in the public schools, in their neat little classrooms 35 hours a week 10 months of the year for 12+ years of their lives. Because the 'real world' is exactly like school. Yup. Guilty as charged.

—Heather Dunham | Dundas, Ont.

I just finished reading the feedback from your story on homeschooling. Several people eluded to the fact that the homeschooling option was for middle class families that could afford it.

We have been homeschooling for four years and survive on one income. As a family we have made choices to drive older cars (1985 wagon), purchase clothing from second hand stores, limit our spending etc.

It is more important right now to provide a solid foundation for our boys than to have brand names, cable t.v. or a week in Cuba. We can give them not only a solid education but develop in them a sense of caring and kindness for others and their community.

Our family is no different than anyone elses. I still have to vigorously remind the boys(occasionally my husband as well) that farting in public is not funny, that just because it has the word "fruit" on the box doesn't necessarily make it count toward their fruit and veg requirements and that I will probably will never give the ok to skateboarding off the roof.

Most homeschoolers are just ordinary parents who are doing their best to make sure their kids will lead happy and productive lives, which I think puts us all on the same page.

—Heather Hayes | Honeywood, Ont.

I was homeschooled by my mother (a single mom working full-time) until Grade 5, when I entered public school. I am now a statistician with a graduate degree, and a normal social life, so I haven't lost out in any way due to my home-schooling. (I think that addresses points made by several previous commenters.)

I am absolutely convinced that my foundation skills (numeric, spelling, grammar, etc.) are far better than they likely would have been had I been entirely educated in the public school system. I also was able to learn both German and English simultaneously, which meant that at age 10 I could read and write in German as well as any Austrian child the same age.

I was able to go on many field trips, even if it was just to the local park to look at the plants and bugs. My mum and I were able to jointly explore questions on our own pace; I look back fondly on some of our afternoons spent studying leaf formations, animal tracks, or snowflakes.

Through home education (and specifically through my mother's very deliberate and engaging pedagogy), I not only learned facts and information, I learned HOW TO LEARN for myself. I attribute a large portion of my academic success to the foundations that my mother laid out for me in my early years, and I am eternally grateful that she was so committed to my education. Only one teacher (in the 14 years of schooling I've had since) has had anywhere near as much impact on what I do today and how I do it.

I hope that homeschooling continues to be a legal option for families in Canada. I do not believe that homeschooling is superior to public education (there are some absolutely amazing public educators out there and some dismal homeschooler parents), but I know that for some families, it is absolutely the better choice.

—Maria Lorenzi | Burnaby, B.C.

Public schooling is not perfect neither is homeschooling. I found the article rather snobbish. Parents who choose to homeschool are likely to be financialy better off and educated, which means they probably went to public schools or private schools.

Bottom line sooner or later parents are not going to be able to meet the demands of higher learning. Their children will not have the training of being in a classroom with other people and the regiment of bells and class times and learning math at 9am as opposed to whenever I'm in the mood. The children as adults will not be able to adjust to teaching being done by a complete stranger who has no emotional or familial interest in them.

Critics of public schools say, it stifles creativity, it's too regimented etc. Parents who homeschool will only pass on their bias and neurosis and regimentation to their children. The only difference between public and homeschooling is Public schools are a cornucopia of neurosis. This is much more difficult to deal with.

—Nick Pirozzoli | Brantford, Ont.

Kudos to CBC and to Ms. Ekoko for this article. It was refreshing to read such pro-homeschooling affirmation.

I have to admit a few of the comments in the "feedback" section bothered me. Sadly, the "Big S" myth is still alive and well, even among the generally open-minded and intelligent CBC audience.

What's the "Big S"? Why, the SOCIALIZATION myth! Why, oh why, oh why do some people still assume, when they hear the term "homeschooling" that children who are homeschooled are socially isolated?

The term "homeschooling" does not mean that the children are locked in the closet when not diligently filling out their little correspondence school workbooks.

This is the picture some seem to have, and it is quite as stereotypical and false as the notion that every school child that's not being bullied and humiliated is in turn squashing the lunches of others!

Look outside of your pre-conceived notions at what is really happening! While doubtless there are "bad" homeschool settings I personally don't believe they are any more common, proportionately speaking, than "bad" classroom or school settings.

Most kids, whether in traditional schools or homeschools, get along just fine the majority of the time. They have friends (and generally a few "non-friends" as well), they are great at some subjects and less great at others, they have their own passions, whether it be computer games or baseball or swimming or dance.

For most kids the "how" of getting their "3 Rs", whether in a traditional schoolroom, or at the kitchen table, is only a small facet of the people they are and will become.

Think about this: while homeschooling there are perhaps, in many situations, MORE opportunities for meaningful social contact and pursuit of personal goals and dreams. I am looking forward to reading more of Ms. Ekoko's articles on this subject.

—Barb Scharf | McLeese Lake, B.C.

I agree with some of the benefits of home-schooling, however, this article is very one-sided. While mentioning the negative aspects of public school, there is no talk of the positive. What about the social skills that home-schooled children will never experience due to seclusion?

Important life lessons are learned on the playground every day, and though some children certainly require more attention than others in the classroom, those who home-school ALL of their children are, in the lamest terms, keeping them away from the real world.

These children will then lack social interactions once they leave the home, furthering their educations in university and/or college. Overprotective parents are every bit as damaging to a young mind as those who neglect their children.

—Jerrod Edson | Mississauga, Ont.

I am a parent active in the learning of my children, who are in a small French-Catholic school in a predominantly English area.

I know a few home-schooling families, and my biggest concern about home-schooled children is how many go on to college or university? How successful are they in post-secondary? This was not addressed in this article.

I wonder too is home-schooling not a more viable option for those families whose father is a high-income earner. The parents I have met who are home-schooling have been mothers, it stands to reason they must be supported because home-schooling is a full-time job.

One parent reported to me that she had home-schooled her daughter due to the child's different learning style, but in the girl's adolescence she went into a high school and was placed a grade behind her age-group due to not being at the same level as those her age.

Schooling is a challenge, teachers are not perfect. In my experience with my children there has been more interaction between the school and the parents than when I went to school in the 70's.

—Francine Martel | Guelph, Ont.

School is often seen as good for 'socializing' children, whatever that means.

As a former public and private school teacher and librarian, I am not overly convinced that throwing children into a general mix when, often, they are not ready, or they are still finding out who they are as individuals. As another has commented, they are 'schooled' -- that's all. There are some excellent teachers who indeed 'draw out' children of all ages, but they are as rare as the excellent school (often without all the bells and whistles).

So, home schooling, for parents who are willing to make that immense, time-consuming, draining committment to bringing their children into a new world of true learning, is the option. Thank goodness it's legal. And blessings to those parents who are helping their children into real learning, without the bells and regimentation.

—Lynne McCarthy | Winnipeg

For several years, we have opted for provincial correspondence curriculum for our children. We were dissatisfied with the level of instruction in the local schools. The teachers were not providing proper classroom discipline or instruction that would allow our children access to post-secondary (university)education.

It seems that many new/young teachers themselves are not educated properly. We saw that the fundamentals of grammar were lacking in the language arts instruction, as well as many failings in mathematics instruction. As parents, we had been better instructed and were able to support the correspondence courses. These courses provided better material than those offered in the public schools to our children.

Attending private schools is not affordable for everyone. Home/correspondence schooling is not an easy programme. It requires parental support and determination from the student and family. As well, there needs to be some social contact for the student. We found ours through sports and music/band.

As an educator and parent, I am saddened that the public schools are not doing a better job of instruction. There seems to be more responsibility "given" to teachers from the parents. With so many parents working to keep up with their financial status, there is less support, discipline, and respect at home for the student and their education.

Thank you for writing about this topic. As the public schools get bogged down with more students who have less support at home, there may be more families taking on this task of home-schooling. It provides a good option, but it is not the answer for everyone.

—Gail Stephan | Fort Nelson, B.C.

This was such an excellent article. It was more than refreshing to read an article on home-learning that was thought out and accurate of myself and all the home learners that I know.

I just had to write to say thank-you to the author for doing this excellent article, and thank-you to CBC for printing it.

—Cristal | Kelowna, B.C.

As I prepare to begin my own journey into the world of home-schooling (my four year old will not be attending Pre-Kindergarten in the fall) I found Ms. Ekwa Ekoko's article validating my own reasons for choosing to home-school.

While home-schooling is becoming more recognized I still daily get family and friends approaching me with concerns and doubts about thadvisabilityty of my choice. I think only time will truly answer their questions and concerns.

Thank you for providing an article on home-schooling. Seeing it discussed in the media helps to make it less "foreign" to everyone.

—Stephanie Land | Sudbury, Ont.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...